China’s emergence as military power splits strategists on threat to U.S.

Well, I have recently pointed out the threat to the south, the threat from Iran, and now I will REMIND you of the threat from China.

From the Washington Times:

A new Pentagon strategy report and recent congressional testimony by the director of national intelligence show the Bush administration remains divided on the threat posed by China’s rise.
The Quadrennial Defense Review report made public last week bluntly states that China is the greatest potential challenge to the U.S. military and is rapidly building up its military.
John Negroponte, the director of national intelligence, by contrast, stated in an annual intelligence threat briefing for Congress that China’s rise is similar to that of democratic India. He left out any reference to the threat to Asia or the United States posed by the military buildup.
The Pentagon report said the U.S. goal is to help China pursue peaceful economic development and political liberalization, “rather than military threat and intimidation.” It notes that Beijing is investing heavily in military force, “particularly in its strategic arsenal and capabilities designed to improve its ability to project power beyond its borders.”
To deal with the threat of China and other emerging threats, the Pentagon report calls for “pursuit of investments that capitalize on enduring U.S. advantages in key strategic and operational areas.”
The military currently is studying how to improve its capability for “deep strike” weapons that can reach inside continental China, including long-range missiles and bombers and possibly space weapons.
Some officials — who dominate the State Department and the intelligence agencies — consider China a nonthreatening state that will evolve into a benign power through trade and other global economic interaction.
Other officials, however, view China as a growing potential danger, engaged in strategic deception to mask hidden goals and objectives.
According to Pentagon officials, early drafts of the strategy report made no mention of China because some officials argued that China’s rise was not strategically significant.
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld rejected that approach and required the report to include references to China’s military buildup and the need for the U.S. military to respond to it.

Thank you Donald Rumsfeld! What a bunch of moronic fools to think you can look into a crystal ball and say that China will be benign. Hope for the best, but always prepare for the worst; that’s my moto. I would fire the bunch of those morons for taking that position. Who’s side are they on anyway?

Previous Highlights:
Analysts Missed Chinese Buildup
China Threatens Nuclear Attack Against U.S.
Boeing Sold Military Technology To China
Chinese People Happy About 9/11 and 7/7

Two charged in plot to smuggle warship technology to China
China Controlling The Panama Canal

2 Responses

  1. The Pentagon report said the U.S. goal is to help China pursue peaceful economic development and political liberalization, “rather than military threat and intimidation.”

    Yeah, cuz that worked so well in Cuba!

  2. Practice makes perfect …

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: